Skip to main content
Log in

Pectoralis-major-pedicled bone window for revision of a shoulder arthroplasty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to review our experience with the pectoralis-major-pedicled bone window for the revision of shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

This study used the retrospective case series of six patients who underwent a pectoralis-major-pedicled bone window for revision of shoulder arthroplasty, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were analyzed.

Results

The mean age of the included patients was 72.6 years old (standard deviation (SD) 4.7), and 83.3% were women (5/1). The mean follow-up was 36.6 months (range 25–48 months). Five patients had a shoulder hemiarthroplasty and one patient a reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The indications for revision were pain in five patients and recurrent dislocation in one patient. No intraoperative complications were found. One patient developed a wound infection that required debridement and a two-stage revision. Despite complications, 2 years after surgery, the range of motions and functional scores were improved from preoperative levels. The difference between preoperative and postoperative VAS pain scores was 7.1 points (p < 0.001). The difference between preoperative and postoperative CSS and ASES questionnaires were 32 and 31.6 points, respectively (p < 0.001). At the final follow-up, all radiographs showed bone union of the osteotomy, good fixation of all components, without evidence of prosthetic loosening or migration.

Conclusions

Revision of a shoulder arthroplasty using a pectoralis-major-pedicled bone window can be an effective treatment that can yield pain relief; however, improvements in motion and function were difficult to achieve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Day JS, Lau E, Ong KL, Williams GR, Ramsey ML, Kurtz SM (2015) Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19:1115–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ingoe HM, Holland P, Cowling P, Kottam L, Baker PN, Rangan A (2017) Intraoperative complications during revision shoulder arthroplasty : a study using the National Joint Registry dataset. Should Elb 9:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573216685706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM (2011) Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2249–2254. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz BE, Savin DD, Youderian AR, Mossad D, Goldberg BA (2015) National trends and perioperative outcomes in primary and revision total shoulder arthroplasty: trends in total shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39:271–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2614-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cisneros LG, Atoun E, Abraham R, Tsvieli O, Bruguera J, Levy O (2016) Revision shoulder arthroplasty: Does the stem really matter? J Shoulder Elb Surg 25:747–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly JD, Zhao JX, Hobgood ER, Norris TR (2012) Clinical results of revision shoulder arthroplasty using the reverse prosthesis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21:1516–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sheth MM, Sholder D, Getz CL, Williams GR, Namdari S (2019) Revision of failed hemiarthroplasty and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 28:1074–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2005) Humeral windows in revision shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 14:258–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Thiel GS, Halloran JP, Twigg S, Romeo AA, Nicholson GP (2011) The vertical humeral osteotomy for stem removal in revision shoulder arthroplasty: results and technique. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20:1248–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duquin TR, Sperling JW (2011) Revision shoulder arthroplasty-how to manage the humerus? Oper Tech Orthop 21:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.oto.2010.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnston PS, Creighton RA, Romeo AA (2012) Humeral component revision arthroplasty: outcomes of a split osteotomy technique. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21:502–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sahota S, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2014) Humeral windows and longitudinal splits for component removal in revision shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:1485–1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gohlke F, Rolf O (2007) Revision of failed fracture hemiarthroplasties to reverse total shoulder prosthesis through the transhumeral approach. Method incorporating a pectoralis-major-pedicled bone window. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19:185–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-007-1202-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Phipatanakul WP, Bowen JM, Jobe CM (2009) Removal of well-fixed flanged humeral prostheses may require humeral expansion. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18:724–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wright TW (2013) Revision of humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 71:77–81

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner ER, Houdek MT, Elhassan BT, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH, Sperling JW (2015) What are risk factors for intraoperative humerus fractures during revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty and do they influence outcomes? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:3228–3234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4448-x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moeini S, Rasmussen JV, Salomonsson B, Domeij-Arverud E, Fenstad AM, Hole R et al (2019) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher risk of revision due to infection than anatomical shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 101:702–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boileau P (2016) Complications and revision of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102:S33–S43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.06.031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J, Boileau P (2011) Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20:146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sajadi KR, Kwon YW, Zuckerman JD (2010) Revision shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of indications and outcomes. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19:308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ortmaier R, Resch H, Matis N, Blocher M, Auffarth A, Mayer M et al (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in revision of failed shoulder arthroplasty - outcome and follow-up. Int Orthop 37:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1742-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Levy J, Frankle M, Mighell M, Pupello D (2007) The use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:292–300. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gonzalez JF, Alami GB, Baque F, Walch G, Boileau P (2011) Complications of unconstrained shoulder prostheses. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20:666–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge H. Nuñez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M. Garcia-Portabella, JH. Nuñez, L. Batalla, Eric Montserrat, Joan Minguell, and J. Massons declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garcia-Portabella, M., Nuñez, J.H., Batalla, L. et al. Pectoralis-major-pedicled bone window for revision of a shoulder arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 1275–1281 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03292-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03292-1

Keywords

Navigation